Legal Opinion

Szarmack v. Welch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1972No. Appeal, 413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The basic issue in this appeal is whether, under the applicable Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, the appellee is entitled to pre-trial discovery of the amount of available liability insurance coverage. This is a question of first impression in the appellate courts of Pennsylvania. The lower courts have split, some requiring disclosure and others construing the Rule of Civil Procedure to prevent compulsory disclosure. 1

Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007(a) provides in relevant part that “. . . the deponent may . . . be examined regarding any matter, not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cook v. WeltyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  4. Slomberg v. PennabakerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Sperath v. Thomas, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Szarmack v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Boicourt v. Amex Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Trzesniowski v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1973
  5. Ballariel v. HoagerhydeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API