Legal Opinion

Trzesniowski v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County

Decided January 11, 1973No. 112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, J.,

The matter for determination arises from motion for protective order to a request for inspection of tangible things pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4009(1). Roughly denominated that which is desired for inspection is the entire file of defendant insurance company gathered in preparation for a suit in trespass in which the present plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant’s insured on February 24, 1971, in the total amount of $79,002, of which defendant insurance company has paid $26,999. Defendant’s insured, Roger Wayne Beggs, then assigned on March 29, 1972,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Loutzenhiser v. DoddoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Shapiro v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coregis Insurance v. Law Offices of Carole F. Kafrissen, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Figueroa, L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Figueroa, L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API