Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Pearson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jacob J. Schwartzward,

J. Motion by defendants seeking alternative relief dismissing the reamended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that there are existing final judgments dismissing the complaint and amended complaint terminating the same causes of action pleaded herein or, in the alternative, dismissing the reamended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of *678the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or in the alternative, dismissing the complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. McLoughlin v. New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Joannes Brothers Co. v. . LambornNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Town of RiverheadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  2. Lait v. LeonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Pearson v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API