Legal Opinion

Joannes Brothers Co. v. . Lamborn

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1923PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCardozo, J.

Plaintiff’s assignor elected to rescind a contract for the purchase of a quantity of sugar on learning that some of the bags were defective in grade. This action is brought for equitable relief decreeing the rescission, or if that relief be denied, then for recovery of the price on the basis of a rescission already declared. An earlier action for the same relief was dismissed on demurrer, the judgment of the Appellate Division proceeding on the ground that there could be no rescission in respect of part without re-tender of the whole. We do not go into the question whether the decision then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Muller v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Linton v. Perry Knitting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Slater v. American Mineral Spirits Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Sorenson v. Keesey Hosiery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Menzel v. ListAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API