Long v. . Miller
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Evidence — Application of Payment — Statute of Limitation. Civil ActioN tried before Montgomery, Judge, and a jury, at August Term, 1885, of Iredell Superior Court. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant ap-appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The appeal of the defendant Miller, from the judgment rendered against him, brings up for review the correctness of the ruling of the Court, upon the question of the effect upon his liability, to be attributed to the entering of the credit ou the note under the circumstances detailed in the evidence. The plaintiff produced the note, bearing the endorsement of a payment of one hundred aud five dollars, in the hand-writing of the deceased administrator Tucker, then acting as such, bearing date May 12, 1881, and an order, obtained from the appellant, on notice to produce, of the same date, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vick v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Sprinkle and Wife v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Wittkowski v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Wittkowsky v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kerr v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Stone Co. v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Pearce v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Young v. . AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.