Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Maurice Mercantile Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1937No. Civ. 10211PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant Maurice Mercantile Co. maintains a store which has a number of departments on the main floor, and several in the basement, including a shoe department. From the main store a stairway, consisting of nine steps, extended down to the basement. The stairway was divided by a bannister; there was also a bannister on each side, the distance between these and the center bannister being about eight feet. The lower bannister post on the right-hand side was on the second step from the basement floor, and that of the center bannister was on the third. The width of the bottom step was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Locke v. Red River Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Thompson v. B. F. Goodrich Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Sanders v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API