People v. Kamin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Four cases were consolidated on appeal in order to resolve a question common to all: should the trial court have granted defendant’s request for jury instructions on lesser included offenses?
Pursuant to People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), and People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), it is clear that a defendant has a right upon request to have the jury instructed on necessarily included offenses. 1 Further, a defendant has a right upon request to jury instructions on those cognate lesser included offenses which are supported by record evidence.
The automatic…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Stevenson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.