Legal Opinion

People v. Kamin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1979No. Docket Nos. 58693, 58728, 59092, 58980. (Calendar Nos. 7-10)PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Four cases were consolidated on appeal in order to resolve a question common to all: should the trial court have granted defendant’s request for jury instructions on lesser included offenses?

Pursuant to People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), and People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), it is clear that a defendant has a right upon request to have the jury instructed on necessarily included offenses. 1 Further, a defendant has a right upon request to jury instructions on those cognate lesser included offenses which are supported by record evidence.

The automatic…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Stevenson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Berra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API