Legal Opinion

Roebuck v. City of Aberdeen

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1996No. 92-CA-01164-SCTPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

671 So.2d 49 (1996)

James D. ROEBUCK and Ruby B. Roebuck,

v.

CITY OF ABERDEEN and Eutaw Construction Company.

No. 92-CA-01164-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 7, 1996.

Gary Goodwin, Goodwin & Goodwin, Columbus, for appellant.

George E. Dent, Soper & Dent, Tupelo, David C. Dunbar, Holcomb, Dunbar Connell Chaffin & Willard, Jackson, for appellee.

Before PRATHER, P.J., and PITTMAN and SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, Justice, for the Court:

On June 30, 1988, James and Ruby Roebuck filed a complaint requesting that the Monroe County Chancery Court enjoin the city of Aberdeen and Eutaw Construction Company from…

Also in this document: Dissent · McRAE; Dissent · McRAE.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tricon Metals & Services, Inc. v. ToppMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Antowyn Cauley v. John WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Carter v. CleggMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Radiant Technology Corp. v. Electrovert USA Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1988

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cucos, Inc. v. McDanielMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Frisby v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Missala Marine Services, Inc. v. OdomMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State Industries, Inc. v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Illinois Cent. RR Co. v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API