Legal Opinion

Frisby v. City of Gulfport

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2013No. 2012-AN-00253-SCTPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The underlying annexation suit was voluntarily dismissed in 2008 with certain terms and conditions imposed on the plaintiff. The plaintiff now seeks clarification of the terms set forth in the order of dismissal. We find that the case should be dismissed as moot, because nothing remains to be decided on appeal.

*567Factual Background and Procedural History

¶ 2. James C. Frisby owns property in Harrison County. On September 20, 2007, Frisby filed a Petition for Inclusion, seeking to have his property annexed by the City of Biloxi. Both the City of Biloxi and the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harrison County v. City of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. CookMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Schmidt v. Catholic Diocese of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  5. City of Madison v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. James D. Hobson, Jr. v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Validation of Tax Anticipation Note, Series 2014 v. Humphreys County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Mississippi Valley Silica Company, Inc. v. Dorothy BarnettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. Peter Barrett v. City of Gulfport, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Gray Properties, LLC v. Utility Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API