Legal Opinion
Radiant Technology Corp. v. Electrovert USA Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided October 19, 1988No. Civ. A. Nos. CA3-88-0323-D, CA3-88-1432-DPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*202MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FITZWATER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these unrelated cases move to dismiss the actions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). The court considers the cases together, adopting non-exclusive factors that will guide the court’s determination of Rule 41(a)(2) motions. Applying the factors to the present eases, the court conditionally grants the motions.1
I
In Radiant Technology Corp. the plaintiff, Radiant Technology Corporation (“RTC”), has sued the defendant, Electrovert USA Corporation (“Electrovert"), for patent infringement. There is also pending between the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Milton Lecompte v. Mr. Chip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Clayton E. Durham v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Betty v. Pace, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd J. Pace, Jr., Deceased v. Southern Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Jeno F. Paulucci and Lois Paulucci v. City of Duluth and Lake Superior Paper IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Carter v. CleggMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Roebuck v. City of AberdeenMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Lawler v. Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd. (In Re Lawler)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
- Pezold Air Charters v. Phoenix Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.