Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

West v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 15, 2004No. 1133032Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partElder, J.

I would hold that James Darrell West properly preserved Ms double jeopardy argument for appeal and that the imposition of pumshment for both common law involuntary manslaughter and aggravated involuntary manslaughter pursuant to Code § 18.2-36.1(B) violated double jeopardy prmciples under the facts of tMs case. To the extent the majority concludes the evidence was sufficient to support West’s remaining convictions, for aggravated involuntary manslaughter and driving while intoxicated, I concur in that portion of the opinion. Thus, I would reverse the conviction for involuntary manslaughter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  5. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API