Lushbaugh v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
The parties in this case seek to have us resolve the issue of whether a stand-alone warehouse-type retail establishment is the modern-day equivalent of a shopping mall and therefore subject to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979) 23 Cal.3d 899 [153 Cal.Rptr. 854, 592 P.2d 341] (Pruneyard), affirmed Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980) 447 U.S. 74 [100 S.Ct. 2035, 64 L.Ed.2d 741]. Pruneyard precludes certain private property owners from unreasonably restricting or interfering with access by members of the public who desire…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America Local 586 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Albertson's, Inc. v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Albertson's, Inc. v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America Local 586 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United Brotherhood v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008