Albertson's, Inc. v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
SIMS, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
—I concur with the majority’s affirmance of the judgment, but, with respect, I do not agree with the majority’s reasoning. I think the free speech guarantees of the California Constitution protect against infringement by private citizens. I also think there has never been a time when the initiative process was more deserving of encouragement. However, this judgment must be affirmed on a narrow ground: appellants failed to prove that this Albertson’s store had replaced the public downtowns of Nevada City and Grass Valley as a public forum. The trial court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.