Legal Opinion

Baker v. Ploetz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 2000No. C6-98-2144Published

1Opinion of the Court

616 N.W.2d 263 (2000)

John E. BAKER, et al., Respondents,

v.

John W. PLOETZ, Respondent,

Morris, Fuller & Seaver, P.A., petitioner, Appellant.

C6-98-2144

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 17, 2000.

Eric J. Magnuson, Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, LLP, Minneapolis, Richard M. Carlson, Morris, Carlson & Hoelscher, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Scott A. Johnson, Johnson Law Group LLP, Minnetonka, for respondents Baker.

John W. Ploetz, St. Paul, pro se.

Stuart T. Williams, Henson & Efron, P.A., Minneapolis, for amicus curiae MN State Bar Association.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API