Legal Opinion
SBA Communications, Inc. v. Zoning Commission of Brookfield
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 6, 2000No. 3:00CV0006 GLGPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff SBA Communications, Inc. (“SBA”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in its action against Defendant Zoning Commission of the Town of Brookfield (the “Commission”). SBA brought this action alleging violations of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7), appealing the Commission’s denial of SBA’s application for special permits to construct a wireless telecommunication facility on a leased parcel at 70 Vale Road in the town of Brookfield. SBA set forth five counts in its Complaint:…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Common Council of City of PeekskillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Village of Floral Park Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. City of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of FentonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Verizon Wireless v. DOUGLAS CNTY. KS BD. OF COM'RS.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.