King v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
The sole issue on this appeal is whether a stockholder-plaintiff who has brought a stockholder’s derivative action without first prosecuting an action to inspect books and records under 8 Del. C. § 220 is, for that reason alone, legally precluded from prosecuting a later-filed Section 220 proceeding. Charles R. King (“King”), the plaintiff-below appellant, brought this Section 220 action for a court-ordered inspection of certain books and records of the corporate defendant-below, appellee VeriFone Holdings, Inc. (“VeriFone”). The Court of Chancery dismissed King’s complaint,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- South ex rel. Hecla Mining Co. v. BakerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- Pyott v. Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. PyottCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- Espinoza v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.