Legal Opinion
TM Patents, L.P. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 2000No. 97 CIV. 1529(CM) (MDF)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 5,212,773 (“THE ’773 PATENT”) FOR LACK OF STANDING, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR NON-INFRINGEMENT
McMAHON, District Judge.
Before me are several motions relating to the viability of plaintiffs claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,212,773 (“the ’773 patent”), relating to a store-and-forward system for transmitting messages from input to output circuits within a massively parallel processor. For the reasons stated below, I conclude that (1)…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loveland Essential Group, LLC v. Grommon Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jasper v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Lear Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.