Legal Opinion

Wright v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1977No. 12669PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

This appeal stems from the trial judge’s denial of a motion to set aside a judgment of dismissal and reinstate litigation. We are presented with the issue of whether the trial judge abused his discretion in denying that motion. We take jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S.Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 47(e).

Appellant Larry J. Wright originally filed suit against Sears, Roebuck & Co. and other defendants in October of 1972. The nature of the underlying cause of action is not germane to this appeal. The complaint did indicate that appellant was, at that time, a resident of Arizona.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. JaggerArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Modla v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Roll v. JancaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Union Interchange, Inc. v. BentonArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Flynn v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hydroculture, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Cline v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. McCarthy v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API