Winans v. Gibbs & Starrett Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Anderson District Court. This action was originally commenced by the Gibbs & Starrett Manufacturing Company against A. L. Serene, J. H. Serene, and H. K. Winans, before a justice of the peace.
Read the full summary
Error from Anderson District Court. This action was originally commenced by the Gibbs & Starrett Manufacturing Company against A. L. Serene, J. H. Serene, and H. K. Winans, before a justice of the peace. The bill of particulars alleged that said company was a corporation under the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, and was a corporation at the time the cause of action arose, and that it owned the promissory note set out in the bill of particulars; that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $120? with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from the 25th…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
It appeared upon the trial that the Gibbs & Starrett Manufacturing Company was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania; that on the 1.1th day of December, 1882, Ered. W. Ames was appointed receiver for the corporation by the court of common pleas of Crawford county, in Pennsylvania. Under the appointment, Ames was receiver of the property and assets of the corporation, wheresoever the same were situated, and he had all the rights, powers, and privileges, and was subject to all the duties and liabilities of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fuller v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Iowa & California Land Co. v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Schaefer v. MilnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Canfield v. ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bottom v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Poll v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.