Legal Opinion
Southeast Cass Water Resource District v. Burlington Northern Railroad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1995No. Civ. 940106Published
1Opinion of the Court
527 N.W.2d 884 (1995)
SOUTHEAST CASS WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant and Appellant.
Civ. No. 940106.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
February 8, 1995.
Steven E. McCullough, Ohnstad Twichell, West Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee.
Daniel J. Crothers, Nilles, Hansen & Davies, Ltd., Fargo, for defendant and appellant.
Julie Ann Krenz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atty. General's Office, Bismarck, for amicus curiae, State of N.D. Submitted on brief.
MESCHKE, Justice.
Burlingt…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.