Legal Opinion

Hart v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1979No. 48329PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Appeal by defendant and third-party plaintiff Cessna Aircraft Company from an order of the Ramsey County District Court granting third-party defendant Vogt’s motion for summary judgment and from judgment entered on October 13, 1977. Affirmed and remanded for proceedings consistent with procedures set out in this opinion.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether, where a plaintiff is unsuccessful in an action against one tortfeasor and brings a subsequent action for the same injury against a second tortfeasor, the second tort-feasor is barred by the verdict in the first action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Spitzack v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Ascheman v. Village of HancockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  3. Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API