Legal Opinion

Missouri Dental Board v. Bailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1987No. WD 38656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Presiding Judge.

The Missouri Dental Board filed a complaint with the Administrative Hearing Commission alleging that Weltman Bailey, a licensed dentist, was subject to discipline for violating § 332.321, RSMo 1969 and RSMo 1978. After a hearing the Commission entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in which it found no ground to discipline Dr. Bailey. On appeal the circuit court affirmed the findings of the Commission.

The Board contends the Commission erred in finding that the statutory reference to obtaining a fee for dental service by “misrepresentation” referred only to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Sermchief v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Edmonds v. McNealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Williams v. PurlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Missouri Real Estate Commission v. McCormickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Cooper v. Missouri State Board of PharmacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Seger v. DowneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API