Legal Opinion

Republic Ins. Co. v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1928No. 463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

The brief of plaintiff in.error contains five assignments. The first two challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. These assignments were not filed in the court below, but appear for the first time in the brief. Only questions of fundamental error can thus be presented to this court, and it is well settled that the want or insufficiency of evidence to support a judgment is not such fundamental error as can be considered by this court, in the absence of a proper assignment of error filed in the court below. Houston Oil Co. v. Kimball et al., 103 Tex. 94, 122 S. W. 533,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BoolesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Maris v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Schmidt v. McCoplinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fowlkes v. FowlkesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Cox v. Chamberlin Metal Weather Strip Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API