Furrow v. First Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFtER; C.
This action involves the question of damages for fraud. The issues were joined and tried upon an amended petition.
The plaintiff, J. W. Furrow, alleged, in substance, a certain transaction wherein defendants Hugh M. Johnson and W. F. Wilson, and the First National Bank of Oklahoma City entered into a .-¡conspiracy to defraud him of certain property of the value of $22,000. He alleges that Hugh M. Johnson and W. F. Wilson induced him to take part in organizing a corporation known as the Art Floral Company, with a capital stock of $50,000, consisting of assets of the Stiles…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Wyrick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lawson v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Tyler v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Miller v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- McDaniel v. QuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Steiner v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935