Legal Opinion

Furrow v. First Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1928No. 16725PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFtER; C.

This action involves the question of damages for fraud. The issues were joined and tried upon an amended petition.

The plaintiff, J. W. Furrow, alleged, in substance, a certain transaction wherein defendants Hugh M. Johnson and W. F. Wilson, and the First National Bank of Oklahoma City entered into a .-¡conspiracy to defraud him of certain property of the value of $22,000. He alleges that Hugh M. Johnson and W. F. Wilson induced him to take part in organizing a corporation known as the Art Floral Company, with a capital stock of $50,000, consisting of assets of the Stiles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Wyrick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Tyler v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Miller v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. McDaniel v. QuinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Steiner v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API