Legal Opinion
ANR Pipeline Co. v. Schneidewind
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 22, 1985No. G84-438 CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action for declaratory relief challenging defendants’ assertion of jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ securities issues under the Michigan public utilities securities statute, M.C.L.A. § 460.301, et seq, M.S.A. § 22.101, et seq., (hereinafter referred to as “Act 144”). The Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC), originally a named defendant, was dismissed from the case by opinion and order entered on September 7, 1984. The remaining defendants are Eric J. Schneidewind, member and chairperson of the MPSC, and Matthew E. McLogan and Edwyna…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anr Pipeline Company and Anr Storage Company v. Eric J. Schneidewind, Matthew E. McLogan and Edwyna G. Anderson, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010