Muckle v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
It seems that where a pardon is unconditional and is duly delivered and accepted, it is not subject to revocation. See Code, § 2-2612; Dominick v. Bowdoin, 44 Ga. 357; Grubb v. Bullock, 44 Ga. 379; Ex Parte Bess v. Pearman, 152 S. C. 410 (150 S. E. 54, 65 A. L. R. 1459); 20 R. C. L. 532, § 13. A pardon, however, is a mere act of grace, to which the pardoning power may attach any condition precedent or subsequent which is not illegal, immoral, or impossible of performance; and when a convict accepts such conditional pardon he is bound by all of its valid provisions. 20 R. C. L.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- State v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Ex Parte DavenportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Crooks v. Sanders, SuperintendentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Johnson v. WallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Randall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Matter of PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Guy v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Pippin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Huff v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.