Legal Opinion

Muckle v. Clarke

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1940No. 13422PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

It seems that where a pardon is unconditional and is duly delivered and accepted, it is not subject to revocation. See Code, § 2-2612; Dominick v. Bowdoin, 44 Ga. 357; Grubb v. Bullock, 44 Ga. 379; Ex Parte Bess v. Pearman, 152 S. C. 410 (150 S. E. 54, 65 A. L. R. 1459); 20 R. C. L. 532, § 13. A pardon, however, is a mere act of grace, to which the pardoning power may attach any condition precedent or subsequent which is not illegal, immoral, or impossible of performance; and when a convict accepts such conditional pardon he is bound by all of its valid provisions. 20 R. C. L.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. State v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Ex Parte DavenportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Crooks v. Sanders, SuperintendentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Johnson v. WallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Randall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  2. Matter of PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  3. Guy v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Pippin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Huff v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API