Legal Opinion

Huff v. Aldredge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1941No. 13676PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The condition attached to the pardon has not been met by the prisoner, but he now challenges the authority of the Governor to attach that condition, and contends that even though the condition is valid it is a condition subsequent, without limitation as to time for performance, thus giving him the right to fulfill the condition at any time during the remainder of the term for which he was sentenced.

Our governmental scheme for protecting society from crime and criminals entrusts to each of the three co-ordinate departments constitutionally defined functions. The legislative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
  3. Pagano v. BechlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Ex parte MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Willingham v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Randall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  2. Hoffa v. SaxbeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. Pippin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Moore v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Pappas v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API