Legal Opinion

David A. Carl Enterprises, Inc. v. Crow-Shutt 14

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1977No. 16851PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Justice.

This appeal is from an order denying the appellant’s motion for a new trial following entry of a default judgment.

Appellant’s first four points of error question the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings that service on the appellant was properly effected.

The appellee’s original petition alleged that appellant could be cited by serving David A. Carl, its registered agent, and that appellant’s registered office was 5731 Gulf-ton, Houston, Harris County, Texas. The petition further alleged that service could also be accomplished by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Whitney v. L & L REALTY CORPORATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hanover Modular Homes of Taft, Inc. v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Vanity Fair Properties v. BillingsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Tullis v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Paramount Credit Inc., D/B/A 5 Star Autoplex v. Kimberly Montgomery, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  2. Travis Builders, Inc. v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Mullins v. Main Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Maddison Dual Fuels, Inc. v. Southern Union Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  5. General Office Outfitters, Inc. v. Holt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API