Legal Opinion

Earl v. Geftax

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1953No. 32402PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in fraud to rescind the sale of a half interest in a furniture store. On June 19, 1952, at the conclusion of the trial, the court orally announced that it would grant a judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount of seven thousand dollars. No findings of fact and conclusions of law or judgment were ever entered in conformity with the oral decision.

The respondents interposed a motion for a new trial'or for judgment notwithstanding the oral decision, and supported it by affidavits, to which appellants objected. Appellants declined respondents’ offer to afford them an opportunity…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lasell v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Fogelquist v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Schoblom v. Anacortes Veneer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tacoma Recycling, Inc. v. Capitol Material Handling Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Grein v. LaPommaWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Carns v. ShirleyWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Dee Ann Johnstone v. Timothy JohnstoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API