State v. Demond
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The defendant, Lee Demond, was convicted of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, X(b) (Supp. 1991), after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.). On appeal, he argues that the Trial Court (Murphy, J.) abused its discretion in denying his motion for a bill of particulars. We affirm.
The defendant contends that he was entitled to a bill of particulars because he was charged with a course of conduct involving three *234different types of penetration over a period of time. The indictment alleged, in pertinent part, that “between April 1, 1989 and January 31, 1990” the defendant
“did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. LakinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Reynolds v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. TynanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. WoodardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. NaughtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994