Legal Opinion

State v. Demond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 14, 1992No. 91-145PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Lee Demond, was convicted of aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, X(b) (Supp. 1991), after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.). On appeal, he argues that the Trial Court (Murphy, J.) abused its discretion in denying his motion for a bill of particulars. We affirm.

The defendant contends that he was entitled to a bill of particulars because he was charged with a course of conduct involving three *234different types of penetration over a period of time. The indictment alleged, in pertinent part, that “between April 1, 1989 and January 31, 1990” the defendant

“did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LakinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Reynolds v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. TynanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. State v. WoodardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. State v. NaughtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API