Legal Opinion

State v. Tynan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 8, 1989No. 88-343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Batchelder, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, for aggravated felonious sexual assault upon a victim less than thirteen years of age. RSA 632-A:2, XI. He contends that the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) denied him due process by refusing to grant his motion to dismiss for pre-indictment delay and that the court abused its discretion in only partially granting his motion for a bill of particulars with respect to the time frame in which the offense was alleged to have taken place. We affirm.

The victim was ten years old in 1981 when she visited the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Cunningham v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LakinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. State v. VaragianisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. State v. HotchkissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FennellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  2. State v. DemondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. State v. Amerigas Propane LP, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Fennell v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API