Legal Opinion

State v. Seymour

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 27, 1998No. 96-381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

After a jury trial in Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.), the defendant, Jason Seymour, was convicted of aggravated felonious sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:2 (1996). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in refusing to give the jury either a time-based defense instruction under State v. Williams, 137 N.H. 343, 629 A.2d 83 (1993), (Williams instruction) or an alibi instruction. We affirm.

The defendant was indicted for an aggravated felonious sexual assault that occurred “on or about” May 2, 1995. He timely filed a notice of alibi, claiming that he was in Mohawk, New York, at the time of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. State v. FennellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. State v. DedrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. PlanteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. BoireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. State v. QuinteroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. State v. LaurentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API