Kunz v. Titusville
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
This appeal involves once again the question whether a given activity of a municipality partakes of the nature of a governmental or a proprietary function; if the former, the municipality is immune from tort liability ; if the latter, if is legally responsible for injury caused by the negligence of its employes.
Plaintiff conducted a business of collecting garbage and rubbish from business places in the City of Titus-ville and hauling it to an incinerator plant owned and operated by the city. On the occasion in question he took such a load to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Briegel v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hill v. Allentown Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Brogan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Boorse v. Springfrield TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Spang & Co. v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Quinones v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MORELAND, ETC., PA.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.