Legal Opinion

Brogan v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1942No. Appeals, 125 and 162PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Mr. Justice Linn,

This was a suit against the City of Philadelphia for personal injury. The city brought in Walter F. Mayer and Howard F. Adams, additional defendants. Mayer was the owner of land abutting on the north side of Levick Street and was engaged in building a row of houses; Adams was doing the brick work. Mayer had obtained from the city, pursuant to an ordinance, 1 a permit to place building material within a limited portion of the street in front of the building operation. Construction or preparation for construction began late in July or early in August, 1935. On Labor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Lawrence v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Stevens Et Ux. v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Mautino v. Piercedale Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Richardson v. LaBuzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API