Guardianship of Dahl, in Re
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
In this guardianship contest, the trial-court, accepting the jury verdict finding that contestant-appellee George Leighton Dahl is not of unsound mind, rendered judgment decreeing, inter alia, that Mr. Dahl is a man of sound mind and that applicant-appellant Gloria Dahl Akin’s application for permanent guardianship is in all things denied. Mrs. Akin’s twelve-points-of-error appeal seeking to reverse the judgment justifies only a reformation of the judgment to conform to the verdict. Reformed and affirmed.
On 28 March 1978, Gloria Dahl Akin filed her ex parte application…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
- Hernandez v. HeldenfelsTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Coxson v. Atlanta Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trailways, Inc. v. Clark, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Mandril v. KasishkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Garcia v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Dahl v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- In the Interest of C.J.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.