Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 2000No. H020538PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

I. Introduction

In this criminal action, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) petitions for a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order granting the Pitchess motion (Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305]) filed by real party in interest Luis Luna (defendant) and compelling production of certain documents from two CHP officers’ personnel records. The documents pertain to an investigation of one officer’s “time card issue” and another investigation regarding “a problem” with a police report written by a second…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. SamayoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Warrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Fletcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API