Legal Opinion

Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Sayre Wholesale Grocer Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1936No. 24668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The relative position of the parties here is reverse to the position occupied in the trial court. They will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff's action was for the recovery of damages upon an alleged breach of warranty of quality of flour purchased by plaintiff. The plaintiff is a domestic corporation with its principal place of business at Sayre in ■Beckham county. The defendant is a foreign corporation with its principal place of business in the state of Kansas.

When the original petition was filed án attachment issued directed to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Dewey v. Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Baisley v. BaisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. In Re Disbarment of ChitwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Ruggles v. First National Bank of CarmenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Kennedy v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Kennedy v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API