Legal Opinion
Malverty v. Waterfront Commission
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 1988PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*979OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding to review a determination of respondent Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor denying his application for restoration to the longshoremen’s register as a checker, contending that respondent had erroneously ignored the relevant provisions of article 23-A of the Correction Law (i.e., Correction Law §§ 752, 753). Respondent denied the application, in part, because of the serious nature of petitioner’s four felony convictions arising out of two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sudano v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sudano v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by25 opinions
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 v. Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Baron v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Rose v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Fraternal Order of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.