Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Matrix Laboratories Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”) brings this breach of contract action against defendant Matrix Laboratories Limited (“Matrix”). Matrix moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6), arguing that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Matrix and that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim for breach of contract. BMS opposes the ■ motion and seeks leave to take jurisdictional discovery in' the ■ event the Court finds personal jurisdiction lacking. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roche Diagnostics GmbH v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013