Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Clark

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 26, 2004No. 25846Published

1Opinion of the Court

360 S.C. 86 (2004)

600 S.E.2d 529

Robert B. KIZER, Laura Cabiness, and the City of Charleston, a Municipal Corporation, Respondents,

v.

Mary B. CLARK, William Wilder, Paul Hadley, III, Karen Bennett, Parris Williams, Leo Simonin and Gwendolyn Johnson, in their capacities as Commissioners of Election for the Proposed Town of James Island, Mary B. Clark, William Wilder, Parris Williams, W. William Woosley, and Joseph Qualey, in their capacities as the Mayor and Town Council of the Proposed Town of James Island, the Town of James Island, and James M. Miles, in his capacity as Secretary of State of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Duke Power Co. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Thomas v. MacKlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Thompson v. South Carolina Commission on Alcohol & Drug AbuseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Glaze v. GroomsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API