Legal Opinion

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Hohn

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1992No. SB-91-0019-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court (Commission) recommended in its report that we sanction Edward L. Hohn (Respondent) for violating several disciplinary rules. Respondent filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of the Commission’s report. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Ariz.R.Sup.Ct, 17A A.R.S. (hereinafter Rule_).

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 11, 1986, the State Bar filed a formal complaint charging Respondent with ten counts of violating the former Code of Professional Responsibility, Rule 29 (hereinafter DR), and the current Arizona…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Northland Pioneer College v. ZarcoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API