Legal Opinion

Viglas v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for injuries, sustained by the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains, due to the alleged negligence of its agents and servants. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict was returned for the plaintiff. At *265the close of the evidence the defendant moved for a directed verdict; the motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. By agreement of parties the judge reported the case to this court with all the material evidence and with the stipulation “that if a verdict should have been directed for the defendant, judgment shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Weinschenk v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Byron v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maher v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. McKay v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Winter v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
  4. Friend v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API