Legal Opinion

Winter v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 9, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, J.:

The substantial question is whether plaintiff has alleged a cause of action against defendant for injuries sustained when a train car door closed on plaintiff’s hand while he was about to go from one car to another. The declaration discloses that plaintiff boarded a train in defendant’s railroad station in Wilmington. After the train started, he discovered that it was bound for a different destination than he had intended. When the conductor learned this, *205he offered to have the train stopped to let plaintiff off at defendant’s yards near Wilmington so that he might return to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinschenk v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. HayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Hardwick v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Brehm v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Cannon v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snelling & Snelling, Inc. v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API