Winter v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Pearson, J.:
The substantial question is whether plaintiff has alleged a cause of action against defendant for injuries sustained when a train car door closed on plaintiff’s hand while he was about to go from one car to another. The declaration discloses that plaintiff boarded a train in defendant’s railroad station in Wilmington. After the train started, he discovered that it was bound for a different destination than he had intended. When the conductor learned this, *205he offered to have the train stopped to let plaintiff off at defendant’s yards near Wilmington so that he might return to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weinschenk v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. HayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Hardwick v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Brehm v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Cannon v. Delaware Electric Power Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snelling & Snelling, Inc. v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949