Legal Opinion

General Shoe Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 25, 1948No. 52234; protest 103942-K (Memphis)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This is a suit against the United States by protest against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of Nashville, Tenn., on 50,000 pairs of iron shoe buckles imported from Mexico. The involved articles were classified at a compound rate aggregating 110 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (e) (2), Tariff Act of 1930, as articles in chief value of metal other than gold or platinum, valued at above 20 cents per dozen pieces, which are “designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KressCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Hensel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Rumpp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. ChichesterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API