Legal Opinion
Rudebeck v. Paulson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 27, 2000No. C1-99-1574PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant Raymond Paulson challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Ford Motor Company, contending genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether alleged defamatory statements were privileged and made with malice. He also challenges the denial of his request for indemnification from Ford for his attorney fees. We affirm as to summary judgment on the defamation claim but reverse the indemnification decision and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Ford Motor Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Dearborn,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Witco Corp. v. BeekhuisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeffrey Sherman v. Rinchem Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Sherman v. American Water Heater Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Whyte v. American Board of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- In re Internet Navigator Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.