Legal Opinion

Pizzutielle v. Graham

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Sew York, second district, borough of the Bronx, in favor of the defendant, with ten ..dollars costs'.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

The action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered. The answer contains a general denial. The plaintiff in his behalf testified that he sold to the defendant certain bluestone to be used in the latter’s building then in process of erection. The defendant admits that blue-*585stone was used in his building, but testified that he thought when the contract of purchase was made that he was dealing with the plaintiff as an officer of a corporation known as the “ Borough Out Stone Company,” and not as an individual, and that he supposed that the bluestone delivered came from such company.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Milk Co. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Everson v. J. L. Owens Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. P. J. Lawrence Lumber Co. v. Thomas & Proetz Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API