Legal Opinion
Koster v. Sullivan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 10, 2012No. 2D11-4766PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Lance Koster challenges the order denying his motion to set aside default, set aside partial final default judgment, and quash service of process. Because a strict reading of section 48.21, Florida Statutes (2010), supports the trial court’s finding that the return of service was regular on its face and the record also supports the trial court’s finding that Koster failed to meet his burden of proving ineffective service, we affirm.
Carol Sullivan commenced the proceeding below by the filing of a complaint against Koster and other defendants who are not parties to this appeal. On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Re-Employment Services, Ltd. v. NLACDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Gonzalez v. TotalbankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bank of America, N.A. v. BornsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Herskowitz v. Schwarz & SchiffrinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lance Koster v. Carol SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Williams v. NunoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Empire Beauty Salon v. Commercial Loan Solutions IV, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Frank Romeo and Connie Yang v. US Bank National AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Kemmerer v. Klass Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.