Legal Opinion
Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 17, 2011No. 3D10-1736PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.
Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order denying their motion to quash service of process, asserting that the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard and there was not competent substantial evidence to conclude substituted service was properly effectuated. We affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Appellee law firm Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP sued its client, Cesar Lindo Hoyos, for unpaid fees.1 It also sued Ana Cristina Robles-Martinez and Jorge Robles-Martinez, Mr. Hoyos’ daughter and son-in-law. These two individuals were not personally served; substituted service was effectuated on May 21,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Slomowitz v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Merritt v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Gonzalez v. TotalbankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Lance Koster v. Carol SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Paola A. Alvardo-Fernandez v. Matthew MazoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- David Davidian and Irma Davidian v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Koster v. SullivanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Vives v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.