Republic-Vanguard Insurance Co. v. Mize
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice.
“and/or. A legal and business expression dating from the mid-19th century, and/or has been vilified for most of its life — and rightly so. To avoid ambiguity, don’t use it.”
Bryan Garner 2
This case involves an insurance law coverage issue arising out of the use of the phrase “and/or” in a paragraph pertaining to exclusions. Appellant, Republic-Vanguard Insurance Company, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Appellees, Charlie Mize d/b/a Quality Framing and Doug Settler, in Republic’s declaratory judgment action seeking a determination whether it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Elaine Neidig v. Valley Health System (Justice Walker, concurring)West Virginia Supreme Court · 2025