Legal Opinion
Roberts v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 10, 2014No. 20-1891PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Roberts appeals a decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting defendant United States’ motion for summary judgment on his claim for living quarters allowance (“LQA”). The United States cross-appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 1 We conclude that the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction over Roberts’ claim was appropriate, and we affirm the grant of summary judgment in the United States’ favor.
Baokground
Roberts asserts that he is owed LQA in connection with his current…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Acevedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.